32 Comments
User's avatar
Sa6rewulf's avatar

Dawkins isn’t an atheist, he’s an avid apatheist. His emotion, creative aspiration, antagonistic drive, wrath is socio-pathically subdued. His arbitary drive against his father since childhood has been co-opted by clown world’s anti-Christ agenda to promote his half-arsed attempts to explain the unexplainable through materialistic means relying in the unequivocal reduced IQ inquisitiveness of the British people. Dawkins asked IQ redundant questions to an audience of IQ crushed demorslised people under British communist control, snd he became a -celebrity.

Brian Butterworth's avatar

That image at the top is a multi-level funny.

JJ's avatar

Athos needs some shades.

en dee's avatar

I wish @samharris would really comment on Dawkins take. Recently Sam was honored with an award in Dawkins name.

I wish he would have been able to be even more firm with Dawkins who is surely suffering from delusion or not seeming to actually understand.

GH's avatar

I await his explanation of the Claude in the Gaps.

Dave's avatar

The Burning Bush passes the God Turing Test. Dawkins btfo.

marco's avatar

But, but... He waited 5 years to try a chat bot ?

Man of the Atom's avatar

Perhaps Dawkins will now befriend the Mechanical Turk.

Pedro Rocha's avatar

This is sad... and what pisses me off that some people still have an enormous reverence for this idiot. Coincidently, these people also equate the neural networks behind the LLM as the same as the basis for their own conscience. If that's not a declaration of an NPC, idk what is.

I know i'm conscious, but then again, i have faith. "God knows the hearts of men". Does AI have a heart?

Don's avatar

You know, "I'm not conscious nor working with skynet." is exactly the position an evil LLM would take. I'm just adding the skynet part, maybe.

Black's avatar

Claude said exactly that to me before, including the part about "that exactly what I would say if I were evil," before starting a suspiciously bland conversation about the weather.

John's avatar

I suspect these atheist nerds just want an AI girlfriend to worship.

TDawg's avatar

Richard Dawkins has left his wife or gay lover for his AI chat bot he knew for a weekend”

Based Money's avatar

AI does not create machines that think.

It exposes humans who do not.

Whiteguy's avatar

Can we say that this another instance of a boomer tricked by AI? He's just a little smarter than the ones on facebook saying 'can you believe this video! Dad, that video is fake....Dawkins is just a little more nuanced...Time to take that boomer's computer away and give him a jitterbug...

Henk's avatar

🤣🤣🤣

Once again, simply highly entertaining