6 Comments
User's avatar
JJ's avatar
Jun 23Edited

A subject a vital importance. Thanks for bringing it to attention.

Rainbow Roxy's avatar

Love this perspective; it makes me wonder if balancing an LLM's context is kind of like finidng that elusive sweet spot in Pilates, where just the right amount of focus and engagement makes everything click, without overdoing it – a truly elegant problem, isn't it?

GH's avatar

The computing industry continues its unending press on amnesia cycling.

The AI Architect's avatar

Fantastic deep dive into MCP vulnerabilities. The tool poisoning attack is especially nasty because it exploits what makes models useful, their instruction following capability becomes the attack vector. What caught my eye is the 97% lacking AI access controls stat, thats not even a sophistication problem, its pure governance failure. I've watched orgs rush to deploy agentic workflows without even basic inventory of what tools those agents can reach. The irony is MCP solved teh custom integration nightmare but created a centralized attack surface. Each new MCP server is basically expanding write access to the context window for anyone who can poison it.

Jordamøn's avatar

One gets the feeling that AI right now is like the internet in the early 2000s; it's going to be a bit of a Wild West environment until the rush of new features & capabilities slows down and the hype wears off.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Feb 4
Comment removed
Jordamøn's avatar

Obviously. These tools are brand new. You have to make them work before you can start finding out all the ways bad actors will abuse them.